Not all trial conversion tools work the same way.

While many vendors claim to “improve activation” or “increase conversion,” they rely on very different mechanisms: analytics, guides, messaging, or AI-driven intervention.

Below is a breakdown of the four dominant approaches, using Pendo, WalkMe, Intercom, and Worknet as representative examples.

‍

1. Measuring Activity + Providing Guides

Example: Pendo

How this approach works
Pendo starts with measuring user activity inside the product:

• Feature usage
• Click paths
• Drop-off points
• Adoption milestones

Based on this data, teams create in-app guides such as:

• Tooltips
• Walkthroughs
• Checklists
• Banners

These guides are usually triggered by rules (e.g., “user hasn’t completed X”).

Strengths

• Strong visibility into trial behavior
• Good for structured onboarding
• Helpful for identifying friction points

Limitations

• Guidance is static and predefined
• No real-time understanding of user intent
• No conversation or adaptive response
• Effectiveness depends on manual setup and iteration

Best for
Products with predictable onboarding flows and clear activation paths.

2. Just Guides (No Intelligence Layer)

Example: WalkMe

How this approach works
WalkMe focuses almost entirely on guided workflows:

• Step-by-step overlays
• On-screen instructions
• UI automation

It does not try to deeply interpret user behavior. Instead, it forces completion of predefined tasks through guidance layers.

Strengths

• Very effective for complex or enterprise workflows
• Reduces user confusion in rigid processes
• Strong for compliance-driven environments

Limitations

• No behavioral intelligence
• No personalization by intent
• No conversation or feedback loop
• Can feel heavy or intrusive in PLG trials

Best for
Enterprise software with complex, mandatory workflows rather than exploratory trials.

3. Nudges and Conversation

Example: Intercom

How this approach works
Intercom improves trial conversion through communication:

• In-app messages
• Nudges
• Live chat
• Automated conversations

When users hesitate, ask questions, or hit friction, Intercom allows teams to respond in context and guide them forward.

Strengths

• Human-feeling interaction
• Good for answering questions during trials
• Flexible messaging and automation

Limitations

• Mostly reactive (user must engage first)
• Limited understanding of in-product behavior
• Automation is rules-based, not adaptive
• Hard to scale personalization without more headcount

Best for
PLG companies with strong support or sales-assist motions during trials.

4. AI Agent–Powered Nudges and Conversation

Example: Worknet

How this approach works
Worknet introduces an AI agent layer that actively monitors trial behavior and intervenes proactively.

Instead of just measuring or messaging, Worknet:

• Detects intent and friction signals in real time
• Initiates contextual, in-product conversations
• Guides users toward the next best action
• Pulls in human experts when AI alone isn’t enough
• Learns continuously from outcomes

This turns the trial into a guided, adaptive experience, not a static flow.

Results

• Meaningful impact typically visible within 30 days
• In some cases, trial conversion can double, especially in long-tail or low-touch PLG motions

Strengths

• Proactive, not reactive
• Personalized per user and context
• Scales guidance without adding sales or support headcount
• Works well for complex products and large trial volumes

Limitations

• Requires access to product usage signals and context
• Newer category compared to traditional analytics or messaging

Best for
PLG companies that want measurable trial conversion impact quickly, especially where sales coverage is limited.

‍